<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iGEA &#187; Attorneys-General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.igea.net/tag/attorneys-general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.igea.net</link>
	<description>Interactive Games &#38; Entertainment Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:10:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Have your say on the new Draft Classification Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/have-your-say-on-the-new-draft-classification-guidelines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/have-your-say-on-the-new-draft-classification-guidelines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 02:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Attorney- General&#8217;s Department is inviting feedback on the new Draft Classification Guidelines. To view the guidelines click here. To complete the online survey and have your say, click here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Attorney- General&#8217;s Department is inviting feedback on the new Draft Classification Guidelines.</p>
<p>To view the guidelines click <a href="http://122.248.250.54/igea/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/110525-Draft-Classification-Guidelines.pdf" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<p>To complete the online survey and have your say, click <a href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/KZ6WR79" target="_blank">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/have-your-say-on-the-new-draft-classification-guidelines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>July is crunch time for the R18+ decision</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/july-is-crunch-time-for-the-r18-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/july-is-crunch-time-for-the-r18-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fed Media Release Minister For Home Affairs And Justice &#8211; The Hon Brendan O’Connor MP Saturday, 5 March 2011 Minister for Justice Brendan O’Connor says July will be the time for Classification Ministers to decide on introducing an R 18+ classification for computer games. “Australians who’ve been following this debate will know that this issue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fed Media Release</p>
<p>Minister For Home Affairs And Justice &#8211; The Hon Brendan O’Connor MP</p>
<p>Saturday, 5 March 2011<span id="_marker"> </span></p>
<p>Minister for Justice Brendan O’Connor says July will be the time for Classification Ministers to decide on introducing an R 18+ classification for computer games.</p>
<p>“Australians who’ve been following this debate will know that this issue has been on the table for many years, without the necessary progress to make a change,” Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p>“Last year the Gillard Government declared its position and it’s time for all States and Territories to declare their hand on this issue.</p>
<p>“The introduction of an R18+ classification for computer games will provide better advice to parents and help prevent children and teenagers from accessing unsuitable material,” he said.</p>
<p><span id="more-2727"></span></p>
<p>At today’s Standing Committee of Attorneys-General in Wellington, draft guidelines for the classification of computer games were tabled. The guidelines were requested at the last SCAG meeting in December.</p>
<p>The draft guidelines:</p>
<p>•             provide appropriate safeguards to restrict the availability of material that’s unsuitable for children</p>
<p>•             address the difference in nature between films and computer games, especially in terms of interactivity</p>
<p>•             ensure that the Refused Classification category is retained.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The introduction of an R 18+ classification must be agreed by all State and Territory Classification Ministers. No final decision could be made at today’s meeting as the New South Wales government is in pre-election caretaker mode.</p>
<p>“I anticipate that my State and Territory counterparts will further consider the draft guidelines and seek their Governments’ position on an R 18+ classification before the next meeting in July,” Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p>“When making their decision, I urge State and Territory Governments to consider the value of an adults only rating in helping to protect children from unsuitable content as well as the strong public support for this move,” Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p>A national telephone survey conducted by Galaxy last year showed that 80% of the 2,226 people contacted said they supported the introduction of an adults only category for games.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The next SCAG meeting will be held on 21 and 22 July in Adelaide.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For more information about classification visit <a title="http://www.classification.gov.au" href="http://www.classification.gov.au/">www.classification.gov.au</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Media Adviser: Jayne Stinson 0458 547 512 <a title="mailto:jayne.stinson@ag.gov.au" href="mailto:jayne.stinson@ag.gov.au">jayne.stinson@ag.gov.au</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/july-is-crunch-time-for-the-r18-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gamespot reveals that an R18+ decision is impossible at March SCAG</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/02/gamespot-reveals-that-an-r18-decision-is-impossible-at-march-scag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/02/gamespot-reveals-that-an-r18-decision-is-impossible-at-march-scag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported today by Laura Parker at Gamespot,  the current NSW Attorney-General will not by attending the March SCAG meeting as his Government will be in caretaker mode, pending the NSW State Election.  Therefore a decision on R18+ can not be made as it requires unanimous agreement from all State and Territory Attorneys-General.  To read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reported today by Laura Parker at <a href="http://au.gamespot.com/?tag=header%3Blogo" target="_blank">Gamespot</a>,  the current NSW Attorney-General will not by attending the March SCAG meeting as his Government will be in caretaker mode, pending the NSW State Election.  Therefore a decision on R18+ can not be made as it requires unanimous agreement from all State and Territory Attorneys-General.  To read the article, click <a href="http://au.gamespot.com/news/6299099.html?tag=latestheadlines%3Btitle%3B1" target="_blank">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/02/gamespot-reveals-that-an-r18-decision-is-impossible-at-march-scag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kotaku &#8211; Classifying the Unclassifiable</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/01/kotaku-classifying-the-unclassifiable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/01/kotaku-classifying-the-unclassifiable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Serrells over at Kotaku has done a great job of explaining the challenges we face with Classification &#8211; not just R18+ but the bigger picture.  To read the article, click here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Serrells over at <a href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/" target="_blank">Kotaku</a> has done a great job of explaining the challenges we face with Classification &#8211; not just R18+ but the bigger picture.  To read the article, click <a href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/2011/01/classifying-the-unclassifiable-r18-and-the-bigger-picture/" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/01/kotaku-classifying-the-unclassifiable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of the National Classification Scheme Announced</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/review-of-the-national-classification-scheme-announced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/review-of-the-national-classification-scheme-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[21 December 2010 Attorney-General Robert McClelland and Minister for Home Affairs Brendan O’Connor will ask the Australian Law Reform Commission to conduct a review of classification in Australia in light of changes in technology, media convergence and the global availability of media content. “As Australia’s foremost law reform institution the ALRC is well suited to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21 December 2010</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="681">
<colgroup span="1">
<col span="1" width="681"></col>
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr height="21">
<td width="681" height="21">Attorney-General Robert McClelland and Minister for Home Affairs Brendan O’Connor will</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">ask the Australian Law Reform Commission to conduct a review of classification in Australia</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">in light of changes in technology, media convergence and the global availability of media</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">content.</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">“As Australia’s foremost law reform institution the ALRC is well suited to lead this important</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">work. The Commission previously conducted an inquiry into laws relating to classification</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">and censorship in 1991,” Mr McClelland said.<span id="more-2642"></span></td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">Minister for Home Affairs Brendan O’Connor said current classification categories would be</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">considered as part of the review.</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">“It has become increasingly clear that the system of classification in Australia needs to be</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">modernised so it is able to accommodate developments in technology now and in the future,”</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">Mr O’Connor said.</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">“When the National Classification Scheme began, classifiable content and the way it was</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">delivered to consumers was relatively static.”</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">“Today, films can be watched in a cinema, on DVD, on TV or downloaded. Many video</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">games include significant film segments to tell stories, and some films have interactive</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">content. The National Broadband Network will increase this ready access to classifiable</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">content.”</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">“People, particularly parents, need a system of classification in Australia that allows them to</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">make informed choices about what they wish to read, see and hear,” Mr O’Connor said.</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">“This important review will look not only at classification categories, but also at the whole</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">classification system to ensure it continues to be effective in the 21st century.”</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">The National Classification Scheme is a cooperative scheme between the Commonwealth and</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">the States and Territories.</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">The Attorney-General’s Department is seeking comments on the proposed terms of reference</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">for the review. The proposed terms of reference can be found at www.classification.gov.au.</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">Any comments should be provided by 28 January 2011.</td>
</tr>
<tr height="21">
<td height="21">Media</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/review-of-the-national-classification-scheme-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Games Industry Disappointed by R18+ Classification Continued Delay</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/video-games-industry-disappointed-by-r18-classification-continued-delay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/video-games-industry-disappointed-by-r18-classification-continued-delay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iGEA News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sydney, Australia – Friday, 10th December 2010 – A decision to introduce an R18+ classification for video games has been postponed today following a Standing Committee of Attorneys General (SCAG) meeting in Canberra. Ron Curry, CEO of the iGEA, says, “It’s disappointing that an adult rating for video games will be delayed once again despite [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sydney, Australia – Friday, 10th December 2010 –</strong> A decision to introduce an R18+ classification for video games has been postponed today following a Standing Committee of Attorneys General (SCAG) meeting in Canberra.</p>
<p>Ron Curry, CEO of the iGEA, says, “It’s disappointing that an adult rating for video games will be delayed once again despite mass support from the Australian community, whether it is from adult gamers who want the right to play games that appeal to them or parents who want clear guidelines for their children.”</p>
<p>We are however pleased that the industry has been given the opportunity to put forward its arguments for an adult rating and encouraged by the tremendous support the issue has received from the Federal Government, and the active engagement by each Attorney General at today’s meeting on the issue.   We’re hopeful that the weight of evidence and the comprehensive research into the matter will ensure an adult rating is introduced when the Attorney-Generals reconvene,” said Curry. <span id="more-2630"></span></p>
<p>The SCAG meeting follows several announcements made earlier this week by Minister of Home Affairs Brendan O’Connor highlighting the Gillard Government’s evidence based support for an R18+ classification for video games.  This study is in line with a range of polls conducted in the last 12 months which show mass support in favour of an R18+ rating for games:</p>
<p>The public consultation conducted earlier this year found 98.4 per cent of submissions were in favour of an R18+ classification for video games</p>
<ul>
<li>News Limited’s poll shows 95.5 per cent of respondents vote for an R18+ classification and 4 per cent vote against it<a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-admin/#_edn1">[i]</a></li>
<li>A poll conducted by Fairfax indicates 97 per cent of respondents believe Australia should introduce an R18+ rating for video games and 3 per cent are against it<a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-admin/#_edn2">[ii]</a></li>
<li>A Channel 7 Sunrise’s poll reveals 97 per cent of respondents would like R18+ games permitted in Australia and 3 per cent would not<a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-admin/#_edn3">[iii]</a></li>
<li>Furthermore, the Interactive Australia 09 report by Bond University found that 91 per cent of gamers and non-gamers believe the classification should be introduced and that 91 per cent of adults would clearly know that game classified R18+ would be unsuitable for children<a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-admin/#_edn4">[iv]</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Despite the majority votes by the community, Australia remains the only developed nation without an R18+ classification for video games and a classification system which is inconsistent across various media.  “While there are some opponents who argue an R18+ rating will only give children access to high level content, this is simply not true.  Content that exceeds the guidelines required for an R18+ classification will still be refused classification and banned in Australia.”</p>
<p>“An R18+ rating for video games will go a long way in helping parents make informed decisions about the games their children play and also provide more consistent guidelines aligned with other forms of media,” said Curry.</p>
<p>This latest news comes fresh off the back of a series of ‘How to set-up Parental Controls’ videos released by the iGEA this week.  The videos, hosted by iGEA ambassador and ABC sports presenter Stephanie Brantz, provides tips to ensure parents only allow children to play games that are age appropriate and for a healthy amount of time.</p>
<p>The video series can be viewed here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/igeavideo?feature=mhum#p/u">http://www.youtube.com/user/igeavideo?feature=mhum#p/u</a></p>
<p>-Ends-</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr size="1" />
<p><a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-admin/#_ednref1">[i]</a> News Limited, 2010, ‘Do you want an R18+ for games?’ &lt;<a href="http://www.news.com.au/technology/eb-games-petitions-for-r18-video-games-classification/story-e6frfro0-1225826969923">http://www.news.com.au/technology/eb-games-petitions-for-r18-video-games-classification/story-e6frfro0-1225826969923</a>&gt;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-admin/#_ednref2">[ii]</a> Fairfax Digital, 2009, ‘Should Australia introduce an R18+ for video games?’, &lt;<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/polls/results.html">http://www.smh.com.au/polls/results.html</a>&gt;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-admin/#_ednref3">[iii]</a> Yahoo7!, 2009, ‘Would you like R18+ rated games permitted?’ &lt;<a href="http://post.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quizresults.php?poll_id=50754">http://post.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quizresults.php?poll_id=50754</a>&gt;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-admin/#_ednref4">[iv]</a> Interactive Australia 2009, National Research prepared by Professor J. Brand, Bond University for the Interactive Entertainment Association of Australia, 2008, &lt;<a href="http://www.igea.net/category/industry-research">www.igea.net/category/industry-research</a>&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/video-games-industry-disappointed-by-r18-classification-continued-delay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Analysis Shows Huge Support For R18+ Computer Game Rating</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/final-analysis-shows-huge-support-for-r18-computer-game-rating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/final-analysis-shows-huge-support-for-r18-computer-game-rating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Minister for Home Affairs and Justice Brendan O’Connor has released the final analysis of feedback from the public on introducing an R18+ classification for video games. The final report will be tabled at this Friday’s (December 10) meeting of Classification Ministers and will help inform their decision making. More than 58,400 people responded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Minister for Home Affairs and Justice Brendan O’Connor has released the final analysis of feedback from the public on introducing an R18+ classification for video games. The final report will be tabled at this Friday’s (December 10) meeting of Classification Ministers and will help inform their decision making. More than 58,400 people responded to the call for submissions on the proposed new adult only category.</p>
<p>Of those that responded, 98.4% voiced support for an R18+ computer game classification.</p>
<p>To see the official release and comments, click <a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/R18+-Final-Analysis.pdf" target="_blank">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/final-analysis-shows-huge-support-for-r18-computer-game-rating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brendan O&#8217;Connor Writes for the Punch on Why the Govt backs an R18+ Rating</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/brendan-oconnor-writes-for-the-punch-on-why-the-govt-backs-and-r18-rating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/brendan-oconnor-writes-for-the-punch-on-why-the-govt-backs-and-r18-rating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To see the opinion piece on the Punch, click here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To see the opinion piece on the <a href="http://www.thepunch.com.au/" target="_blank">Punch</a>, click <a href="http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/why-the-government-backs-an-R18-games-rating/" target="_blank">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/brendan-oconnor-writes-for-the-punch-on-why-the-govt-backs-and-r18-rating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gillard government advocates for R18+</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/gillard-government-advocates-for-r18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/gillard-government-advocates-for-r18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 23:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; THE HON BRENDAN O’CONNOR MP MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS AND JUSTICE MEDIA RELEASE An adult-only computer game classification to help protect our kids Minister for Home Affairs and Justice Brendan O’Connor today announced that the Gillard Government will advocate for the introduction of an adult only classification for video games. “We want to provide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align: center;"><strong>THE HON BRENDAN O’CONNOR MP</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align: center;"><strong>MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS AND JUSTICE</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align: center;"><strong>MEDIA RELEASE</strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align: center;"><strong>An adult-only computer game classification to help protect our kids</strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Minister for Home Affairs and Justice Brendan O’Connor today announced that the Gillard Government will advocate for the introduction of an adult only classification for video games.</div>
<p>“We want to provide better guidance for parents and remove unsuitable material from children and teenagers. The introduction of an R18+ classification will help achieve that.”</p>
<p>The announcement comes ahead of Friday’s Standing Committee of Attorneys-General meeting, where Classification Ministers will be asked to make a decision on the issue.</p>
<p>“We believe that this is the right decision for Australian families and the right decision for parents who want to be able to make informed choices about the games their children play.”</p>
<p>“Children and teenagers shouldn’t be exposed to the gratuitous sex, violence and adult themes that are contained in some computer games,” Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p>“There are dozens of games that are currently classified as MA15+ in Australia, but in other countries these gaming titles are restricted to adults only.</p>
<p>“If the new category is introduced, it could result in computer games that are currently classified MA15+ being reclassified R18+, providing a new level of protection for children.”</p>
<p>“Games that are currently refused classification and do not meet the standard required for R18+ classification will remain in the refused classification category.”</p>
<p>The argument for a new adult classification is backed by research, some of which has been released in recent weeks. (For details visit www.ag.gov.au/gamesclassification).</p>
<p>The latest available data is a Galaxy survey, requested by the Standing Committee of Attorneys- General in May to assist Ministers in their decision making.</p>
<p>The national telephone survey shows that 80% of the 2,226 people contacted said they support the introduction of an R18+ classification for games.</p>
<p>“This survey also reflects the community feedback that I and many members of the Gillard Government have received from our constituents in recent years,” he said.</p>
<p>The national survey found that, of those surveyed:</p>
<div>
<ul>
<li>91% said that adults would know that a game classified R18+ is clearly unsuitable for children</li>
<li>81% aged over 50 agreed that there should be an R 18+ classification for computer games</li>
<li>76% of households with children aged under 18 thought that there should be an R18+ classification for computer games.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>Support was strong across all States and Territories:</p>
<div id="_mcePaste">
<ul>
<li>Western Australia &#8211; 84%</li>
<li>Victoria &#8211; 82%</li>
<li>Tasmania &#8211; 82%</li>
<li>South Australia &#8211; 81%</li>
<li>Northern Territory &#8211; 81%</li>
<li>Queensland &#8211; 80%</li>
<li>New South Wales &#8211; 77%</li>
<li>Australian Capital Territory &#8211; 77%</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>The survey results build on the recent public consultation, where 98% of about 57,000 people supported the introduction of an adult classification.</p>
<p>Australia’s most restrictive classification for video games is currently MA15+. Games that do not satisfy this category are refused classification and cannot be brought into Australia.</p>
<p>An R18+ classification for computer games can only be introduced with the agreement of all Commonwealth, State and Territory Ministers.</p>
<p>Media Adviser: Jayne Stinson 0458 547 512 jayne.stinson@ag.gov.au</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/gillard-government-advocates-for-r18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government poll supports an R18+ classification</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/government-poll-supports-an-r18-classification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/government-poll-supports-an-r18-classification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In December 2010 Minister for Home Affairs, Brendan O&#8217;Connor, released the results of a national telephone poll conducted by independent research company Galaxy research which found 80% support for the introduction of an R 18+ classification for computer games. The poll covered 2,226 respondents aged 16 years and over from all Australian States and Territories. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In December 2010 Minister for Home Affairs, Brendan O&#8217;Connor, released the  results of a national telephone poll conducted by independent research company  Galaxy research <strong>which found 80% support for the introduction of an R 18+  classification for computer games</strong>.</p>
<p>The poll covered 2,226 respondents aged 16 years and over from all Australian  States and Territories.</p>
<p>The poll asked participants to indicate how strongly they agreed or disagreed  with a number of statements relevant to an R 18+ classification, then answer the  question ‘Should there be an R 18+ classification category for computer games in  Australia?’ These poll questions are included in the report which is available  for download.</p>
<p>A wide range of demographics were covered, including; age, gender, capital  cities (versus elsewhere), work status, marital status, household income,  children under 18 years in the household and level of education (below year 12  and year 12+). Age, gender and location demographics were weighted to reflect  the latest ABS population estimates.</p>
<p>Download the telephone poll results:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/(084A3429FD57AC0744737F8EA134BACB)~Final+Report+-+R+18+plus+National+Telephone+Poll+-+December+2010.PDF/$file/Final+Report+-+R+18+plus+National+Telephone+Poll+-+December+2010.PDF" target="_self">Telephone poll results [PDF 488KB]</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/12/government-poll-supports-an-r18-classification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

