<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iGEA &#187; classification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.igea.net/tag/classification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.igea.net</link>
	<description>Interactive Games &#38; Entertainment Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:10:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>R18+ &#8211; Let&#8217;s just get this thing done</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/r18-lets-just-get-this-thing-done/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/r18-lets-just-get-this-thing-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 02:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We couldn&#8217;t agree more with this piece on Kotaku from Mark Serrels.  Well said Mark!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We couldn&#8217;t agree more with this <a href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/2011/05/r18-lets-just-get-this-thing-done/" target="_blank">piece </a>on <a href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/" target="_blank">Kotaku</a> from Mark Serrels.  Well said Mark!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/r18-lets-just-get-this-thing-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have your say on the new Draft Classification Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/have-your-say-on-the-new-draft-classification-guidelines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/have-your-say-on-the-new-draft-classification-guidelines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 02:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Attorney- General&#8217;s Department is inviting feedback on the new Draft Classification Guidelines. To view the guidelines click here. To complete the online survey and have your say, click here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Attorney- General&#8217;s Department is inviting feedback on the new Draft Classification Guidelines.</p>
<p>To view the guidelines click <a href="http://122.248.250.54/igea/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/110525-Draft-Classification-Guidelines.pdf" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<p>To complete the online survey and have your say, click <a href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/KZ6WR79" target="_blank">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/have-your-say-on-the-new-draft-classification-guidelines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draft R18+ computer game rating guidelines released</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/draft-r18-computer-game-rating-guidelines-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/draft-r18-computer-game-rating-guidelines-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 04:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minister for Justice Brendan O’Connor today released draft guidelines that would support the introduction of an R18+ classification for computer games. The draft guidelines have been distributed to State and Territory Classification Ministers to assist in their decision making ahead of a meeting in July to decide whether to create the new rating. “The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Minister for Justice Brendan O’Connor today released draft guidelines that would support the introduction of an R18+ classification for computer games.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://122.248.250.54/igea/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/110525-Draft-Classification-Guidelines.pdf" target="_blank">draft guidelines</a> have been distributed to State and Territory Classification Ministers to assist in their decision making ahead of a meeting in July to decide whether to create the new rating.</p>
<p>“The Gillard Government wants to provide better guidance for parents and remove unsuitable material from children and teenagers,” Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p>“The introduction of an R18+ classification will help achieve that and will also bring Australia into line with comparable nations,” he said.</p>
<p>“This issue has been on the table for many years, without the necessary progress to make a change.</p>
<p>“We’ve recently seen several states publicly express their support for an adult only rating for games and I’m keen to reach a unanimous decision at the July meeting,” Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p>Under present legislation, an R18+ classification for computer games can only be introduced with the agreement of all Commonwealth, State and Territory Ministers.</p>
<p>“The draft guidelines make it clear that sexually explicit games or games with very frequent, strong and realistic violence will not be allowed in the MA15+ category,” Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p>The draft guidelines:<br />
• provide safeguards to restrict the availability of material that is unsuitable for children<br />
• address the difference between films and computer games, especially in terms of interactivity<br />
• ensure that the Refused Classification category is retained.</p>
<p>A national telephone survey by Galaxy last year showed that 80% of the 2,226 people contacted said they support the introduction of an R18+ classification for games.</p>
<p>Those results built on public consultation in which 98% of about 57,000 people supported the introduction of an adult classification.</p>
<p>The draft guidelines were first distributed to Classification Ministers at the last Standing Council of Attorneys General meeting in March, and are now being distributed publicly to facilitate further community feedback.</p>
<p>The draft guidelines are available at www.classification.gov.au. Public feedback will be accepted online until Wednesday 22 June 2011.</p>
<p>Media Adviser: Jayne Stinson 0458 547 512 jayne.stinson@ag.gov.au</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/05/draft-r18-computer-game-rating-guidelines-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>R18+: Rationality is Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/04/r18-rationality-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/04/r18-rationality-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great piece written by Mark Serrels over Kotaku on the absence of any rational argument in the R18+ debate.  To read click here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great piece written by Mark Serrels over <a href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/" target="_blank">Kotaku</a> on the absence of any rational argument in the R18+ debate.  To read click <a href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/2011/04/r18-rationality-is-dead/" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/04/r18-rationality-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of the National Classification Scheme Starts</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/review-of-the-national-classification-scheme-starts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/review-of-the-national-classification-scheme-starts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 03:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MEDIA RELEASE THURSDAY 24 MARCH 2011&#160; THE HON ROBERT McCLELLAND MP ATTORNEY-GENERAL THE HON BRENDAN O’CONNOR MP MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS AND JUSTICE MEDIA RELEASE The Gillard Government today launched a comprehensive review of the National Classification Scheme to be conducted by the Australian Law Reform Commission. Attorney-General Robert McClelland has referred the Scheme to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span style="font-size: small;"><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">MEDIA RELEASE THURSDAY 24 MARCH 2011&nbsp;</p>
<p>THE HON ROBERT McCLELLAND MP</p>
<p></span></strong><strong> </strong><strong><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,Times New Roman; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,Times New Roman; font-size: medium;">ATTORNEY-GENERAL </span></span><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">THE HON BRENDAN O’CONNOR MP </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,Times New Roman; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,Times New Roman; font-size: medium;">MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS AND JUSTICE </span></span><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">MEDIA RELEASE </span></strong></strong></strong></p>
<p>The Gillard Government today launched a comprehensive review of the National Classification Scheme to be conducted by the Australian Law Reform Commission.</p>
<p>Attorney-General Robert McClelland has referred the Scheme to the Australian Law Reform Commission and asked it to conduct widespread public consultation across the community and industry.</p>
<p>The Government today released the final terms of reference for the review of the National Classification Scheme following community consultation.</p>
<p>The review will consider issues including:</p>
<ul>
<li>existing Commonwealth, State and Territory classification laws</li>
<li>the current classification categories contained in the Classification Act, Code and Guidelines</li>
<li>the rapid pace of technological change</li>
<li>the need to improve classification information available to the community</li>
<li>the effect of media on children and</li>
<li>the desirability of a strong content and distribution industry in Australia.<span id="more-2740"></span></li>
</ul>
<p>Mr McClelland said the ALRC last reviewed classification standards twenty years ago.</p>
<p>&#8220;That review helped to develop the cooperative scheme between the Commonwealth and the States and Territories that we have today,&#8221; Mr McClelland said.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given the advances in technology and media we’ve seen since then, it is timely this work is undertaken.</p>
<p>&#8220;I’ve asked the ALRC to develop options for ensuring the system of classification in Australia is able to accommodate developments in technology in light of media convergence and the global availability of media content.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Minister responsible for classification, Brendan O’Connor, said technology is fast moving and the review will examine how the classification system can cater for advances into the future.</p>
<p>&#8220;A lot has changed in recent years. Australians now access content through the Internet and mobile phones and that poses challenges for the existing classification scheme,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;We’re also seeing the convergence of different technology platforms and the worldwide accessibility of some content, which also creates new concerns,&#8221; Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p>&#8220;Australians need to be confident that our classification system will help them make informed choices about what they choose to read, see, hear and play,&#8221; Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p>&#8220;That’s particularly important for parents who rely on the National Classification Scheme to make sensible choices for their children,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>The appointment of a new ALRC Commissioner to work on the review will be announced shortly.</p>
<p>The ALRC has been asked to provide its final report by 30 January 2012. The terms of reference and further information is available at www.alrc.gov.au.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p>Ryan Liddell</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">(McClelland) 02 6277 7300 or 0427 225 763 </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p>Jayne Stinson</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">(O’Connor) 0458 547 512 jayne.stinson@ag.gov.au </span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/review-of-the-national-classification-scheme-starts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Threatens R18+ Showdown</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/government-threatens-r18-showdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/government-threatens-r18-showdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported at abc.net.au, if there is no agreement to change the rating system for computer games at the next SCAG meeting in July, there could be a wide-ranging shake up of the Classification Act.  To read more click here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reported at <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/" target="_blank">abc.net.au</a>, if there is no agreement to change the rating system for computer games at the next SCAG meeting in July, there could be a wide-ranging shake up of the Classification Act.  To read more click <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/03/16/3165063.htm?section=justin" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/government-threatens-r18-showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>July is crunch time for the R18+ decision</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/july-is-crunch-time-for-the-r18-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/july-is-crunch-time-for-the-r18-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fed Media Release Minister For Home Affairs And Justice &#8211; The Hon Brendan O’Connor MP Saturday, 5 March 2011 Minister for Justice Brendan O’Connor says July will be the time for Classification Ministers to decide on introducing an R 18+ classification for computer games. “Australians who’ve been following this debate will know that this issue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fed Media Release</p>
<p>Minister For Home Affairs And Justice &#8211; The Hon Brendan O’Connor MP</p>
<p>Saturday, 5 March 2011<span id="_marker"> </span></p>
<p>Minister for Justice Brendan O’Connor says July will be the time for Classification Ministers to decide on introducing an R 18+ classification for computer games.</p>
<p>“Australians who’ve been following this debate will know that this issue has been on the table for many years, without the necessary progress to make a change,” Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p>“Last year the Gillard Government declared its position and it’s time for all States and Territories to declare their hand on this issue.</p>
<p>“The introduction of an R18+ classification for computer games will provide better advice to parents and help prevent children and teenagers from accessing unsuitable material,” he said.</p>
<p><span id="more-2727"></span></p>
<p>At today’s Standing Committee of Attorneys-General in Wellington, draft guidelines for the classification of computer games were tabled. The guidelines were requested at the last SCAG meeting in December.</p>
<p>The draft guidelines:</p>
<p>•             provide appropriate safeguards to restrict the availability of material that’s unsuitable for children</p>
<p>•             address the difference in nature between films and computer games, especially in terms of interactivity</p>
<p>•             ensure that the Refused Classification category is retained.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The introduction of an R 18+ classification must be agreed by all State and Territory Classification Ministers. No final decision could be made at today’s meeting as the New South Wales government is in pre-election caretaker mode.</p>
<p>“I anticipate that my State and Territory counterparts will further consider the draft guidelines and seek their Governments’ position on an R 18+ classification before the next meeting in July,” Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p>“When making their decision, I urge State and Territory Governments to consider the value of an adults only rating in helping to protect children from unsuitable content as well as the strong public support for this move,” Mr O’Connor said.</p>
<p>A national telephone survey conducted by Galaxy last year showed that 80% of the 2,226 people contacted said they supported the introduction of an adults only category for games.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The next SCAG meeting will be held on 21 and 22 July in Adelaide.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For more information about classification visit <a title="http://www.classification.gov.au" href="http://www.classification.gov.au/">www.classification.gov.au</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Media Adviser: Jayne Stinson 0458 547 512 <a title="mailto:jayne.stinson@ag.gov.au" href="mailto:jayne.stinson@ag.gov.au">jayne.stinson@ag.gov.au</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/july-is-crunch-time-for-the-r18-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CEO&#8217;s thoughts on the banning of Mortal Kombat</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/ceos-thoughts-on-the-banning-of-mortal-kombat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/ceos-thoughts-on-the-banning-of-mortal-kombat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iGEA News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The granting of another RC to a video game clearly designed and targeted at ADULTS again highlights the shortcomings of the current classification scheme. In particular, the absence of an adult classification. As with many other forms of media, there is a demand and place for an adult themed narrative. We trust adults with this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/iGEA-050.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2723" title="iGEA 050" src="http://www.igea.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/iGEA-050-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="149" /></a> The granting of another RC to a video game clearly designed and targeted at ADULTS again highlights the shortcomings of the current classification scheme. In particular, the absence of an adult classification.</p>
<p>As with many other forms of media, there is a demand and place for an adult themed narrative. We trust adults with this material in other media forms, yet deny them similar access simply because it’s a ‘game’.  We would not accept the  argument that because it’s “unsuitable for a minor to see or play” that it should therefore be banned in any other media form, so why video games?</p>
<p>When a highly anticipated game receives an RC we can expect two things to happen; interest in obtaining the game will actually increase and people will still get the game either through importing (ordering online) or pirating; the latter an encouragement to commit a crime in order to perpetuate the crime of accessing illegal content. Ironically, the game is then widely available in Australia without any identifiable classification markings. How is this informing parents and protecting children?</p>
<p>It is the industry position that an adult classification sends a clear message to the public that the content is not suitable for minors and is the most effective means of guiding access to mature content. Refusing classification of titles that meet adult rating criteria in every other Western country in our digital age is ineffective and naïve.</p>
<p>It is also important to highlight that content that exceeds the guidelines of an R18+ classification, should it be introduced, would still be refused classification and banned in Australia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/03/ceos-thoughts-on-the-banning-of-mortal-kombat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gamespot reveals that an R18+ decision is impossible at March SCAG</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/02/gamespot-reveals-that-an-r18-decision-is-impossible-at-march-scag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/02/gamespot-reveals-that-an-r18-decision-is-impossible-at-march-scag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported today by Laura Parker at Gamespot,  the current NSW Attorney-General will not by attending the March SCAG meeting as his Government will be in caretaker mode, pending the NSW State Election.  Therefore a decision on R18+ can not be made as it requires unanimous agreement from all State and Territory Attorneys-General.  To read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reported today by Laura Parker at <a href="http://au.gamespot.com/?tag=header%3Blogo" target="_blank">Gamespot</a>,  the current NSW Attorney-General will not by attending the March SCAG meeting as his Government will be in caretaker mode, pending the NSW State Election.  Therefore a decision on R18+ can not be made as it requires unanimous agreement from all State and Territory Attorneys-General.  To read the article, click <a href="http://au.gamespot.com/news/6299099.html?tag=latestheadlines%3Btitle%3B1" target="_blank">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/02/gamespot-reveals-that-an-r18-decision-is-impossible-at-march-scag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Conroy Supports R18+ for Games Classification</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2011/02/stephen-conroy-supports-r18-for-games-classification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2011/02/stephen-conroy-supports-r18-for-games-classification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Ramli over at arnnet.com.au has interviewed Communications Minister, Senator Stephen Conroy and discovered that Senator Conroy strongly supports an R18+ for games in Australia.  To read the interview, click here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Ramli over at <a href="http://www.arnnet.com.au/" target="_blank">arnnet.com.au </a>has interviewed Communications Minister, Senator Stephen Conroy and discovered that Senator Conroy strongly supports an R18+ for games in Australia.  To read the interview, click <a href="http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/375420/conroy_supports_r18_game_classification/?utm_content=awesm-site&amp;utm_medium=idg.to-copypaste&amp;utm_source=direct-idg.to" target="_blank">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2011/02/stephen-conroy-supports-r18-for-games-classification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

