<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iGEA &#187; submissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.igea.net/tag/submissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.igea.net</link>
	<description>Interactive Games &#38; Entertainment Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:10:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gamespot takes an in-depth look at the Australian Government Report into R18+</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/05/gamespot-takes-an-in-depth-look-at-the-australian-government-report-into-r18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/05/gamespot-takes-an-in-depth-look-at-the-australian-government-report-into-r18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussion paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=2009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura Parker at gamespot.com.au has written a fantastic story about the recently Government Report into R18+ public consultation. Following the initial news that 98.2 percent of the 59,678 public submissions received by the Commonwealth Attorney-General&#8217;s Department were in favour of introducing R18+, GameSpot AU has combed the report&#8217;s contents to present a detailed summary of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura Parker at <a href="http://au.gamespot.com/?tag=header%3Blogo" target="_blank">gamespot.com.au </a>has written a fantastic story about the recently Government Report into R18+ public consultation.</p>
<p>Following the initial news that 98.2 percent of the 59,678 public submissions received by the Commonwealth Attorney-General&#8217;s Department were in favour of introducing R18+, GameSpot AU has combed the report&#8217;s contents to present a detailed summary of the key points.  See <a href="http://au.gamespot.com/news/6261818.html?tag=latestheadlines%3Btitle%3B1" target="_blank">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/05/gamespot-takes-an-in-depth-look-at-the-australian-government-report-into-r18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support for an R18+ Growing</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/support-for-an-r18-growing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/support-for-an-r18-growing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussion paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=1760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[22 February 2010 For Immediate Release Support for an R18+, Growing The Attorney-General’s Department is set to receive an influx of submissions from people who support the introduction of an R18+ category for computer games into the Australian classification system. The submissions were made via an online form provided by Grow up Australia, an independent group advocating the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22 February 2010</p>
<p><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<h1>Support for an R18+, Growing</h1>
<p>The Attorney-General’s Department is set to receive an influx of submissions from people who support the introduction of an R18+ category for computer games into the Australian classification system. The submissions were made via an online form provided by Grow up Australia, an independent group advocating the introduction of an adults only rating for games.</p>
<p>Grow up Australia will contribute 16,055 submissions from people who used their online form. The bulk of the submissions were collected during a partnership with EB Games during which Grow up Australia posters were displayed in all of EB Games&#8217; 250+ Australian stores. A link to the online submission form was also provided via a banner on the EB Games website during the campaign.<span id="more-1760"></span></p>
<p>Australia is the only developed nation without an adult rating for video games despite the average Australian gamer being 30 years old.[1] In December 2009, the Attorney-General’s Department released a discussion paper calling for community feedback on the issue.</p>
<p>Aaron John Percival, Gamer activist and one of the founders of Grow up Australia, said “support for the introduction of the R18+ rating has been overwhelming<em> </em>with ninety-nine percent of the submissions made through the website in favour of the change”.</p>
<p>The co-founder of the group, Jake Edwards, added that “with less than a week until the deadline for submissions, there is still opportunity for people who want to get involved to make a submission directly to the Attorney-General’s Department”.</p>
<p>To make a submission to the Attorney-General’s Department, log on to: <a href="http://www.ag.gov.au/gamesclassification" target="_blank">http://www.ag.gov.au/gamesclassification</a></p>
<p>The submissions will be sent tomorrow so that they will be received before the deadline of the 28th of February 2010.</p>
<p>- END -</p>
<p align="center"><strong>MEDIA CONTACT –</strong> Aaron John Percival &#8211; <a href="mailto:aaron.john@growupaustralia.com">aaron.john@growupaustralia.com</a> &#8211; <a href="http://www.growupaustralia.com/">www.growupaustralia.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/support-for-an-r18-growing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iGEA Responds to R18+ Discussion Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/r18-submission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/r18-submission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iGEA News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=1660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R18+ Classification for Video Games: Industry Responds to Discussion Paper Sydney, February 15, 2010 – The Interactive Games &#38; Entertainment Association (iGEA) has today made its submission to Attorney-General’s Department on the proposed R18+ classification for video games in Australia.  Representing platform holders, publishers and distributors, the iGEA appeals for an R18+ classification to cater [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><strong>R18+ Classification for Video Games: Industry Responds to Discussion Paper</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sydney, February 15, 2010 </strong>– The Interactive Games &amp; Entertainment Association (iGEA) has today made its submission to Attorney-General’s Department on the proposed R18+ classification for video games in Australia.  Representing platform holders, publishers and distributors, the iGEA appeals for an R18+ classification to cater to the maturing gaming population and ensure consistent classification amongst other forms of entertainment.</p>
<p>Ron Curry, CEO of the iGEA, says there is overwhelming support for an adult rating not only amongst gamers but parents, families and the wider community.</p>
<p>“Australia needs an adult rating so adults can play games that are age appropriate for them and parents can make educated choices for their families based on clear, consistent guidelines.  With the deadline for submissions closing on February 28, we urge the community to make their voices heard in support of an adult classification,” said Curry.</p>
<p>Australia is currently the only Western country without an adult classification for video games with the maximum rating MA15+.  Yet despite this, the release of the discussion paper last December has unveiled mass approval for an R18+ classification for video games across a wide range of polls conducted in the media;</p>
<ul>
<li>News Limited’s poll shows 95.5 per cent of respondents vote for an R18+ classification and 4 per cent vote against it (1)</li>
<li>A poll conducted by Fairfax indicates 97 per cent of respondents believe Australia should introduce an R18+ rating for video games and 3 per cent are against it (2)</li>
<li>A Channel 7 Sunrise’s poll reveals 97 per cent of respondents would like R18+ games permitted in Australia and 3 per cent would not (3)</li>
<li>Furthermore, the Interactive Australia 09 report by Bond University found that 91 per cent of gamers and non-gamers believe the classification should be introduced (4)</li>
<li>“There have been some claims an R18+ classification will expose Australia to unlimited high level content but this is simply not the case. The Classification Board will still refuse games that exceed the adult rating guidelines.</li>
</ul>
<p>An R18+ classification is essential to protect consumers whilst providing them with the full information to make educated decisions about their entertainment choices,” said Curry.</p>
<p>To sign a petition for an R18+ classification for video games, you can log on to <a href="http://www.growupaustralia.com/" target="_blank">http://www.growupaustralia.com/</a> or directly at the Attorney-General’s Department at <a href="http://www.ag.gov.au/gamesclassification" target="_blank">http://www.ag.gov.au/gamesclassification</a>.</p>
<p><strong>The iGEA’s submission can be found </strong><a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/iGEA-R18+-Submission.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>here</strong></a>.</p>
<p>This is the first time Censorship Ministers have undertaken public consultation on this issue, with submissions welcomed until close of business on February 28, 2010.</p>
<hr size="1" />
<p><span style="color: #808080;">(1) News Limited, 2010, ‘</span><a href="http://www.news.com.au/technology/eb-games-petitions-for-r18-video-games-classification/story-e6frfro0-1225826969923" target="_blank"><span style="color: #808080;">Do you want an R18+ for games</span></a><span style="color: #808080;">?’ </span></p>
<div><span style="color: #808080;"> </span></div>
<p><span style="color: #808080;">(2) Fairfax Digital, 2009, ‘</span><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/polls/results.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #808080;">Should Australia introduce an R18+ for video games?</span></a><span style="color: #808080;">’, </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #808080;">(3) Yahoo7!, 2009, ‘</span><a href="http://post.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quizresults.php?poll_id=50754" target="_blank"><span style="color: #808080;">Would you like R18+ rated games permitted?</span></a><span style="color: #808080;">’ </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #808080;">(4) </span><a href="www.igea.net/category/industry-research" target="_blank"><span style="color: #808080;">Interactive Australia 2009</span></a><span style="color: #808080;">, National Research prepared by Professor J. Brand, Bond University for the Interactive Entertainment Association of Australia, 2008</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/r18-submission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No word from Government on R18+ response</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/no-word-from-government-on-r18-response/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/no-word-from-government-on-r18-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=1579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura Parker over at gamespot, reports that the  Australian federal government is remaining noncommittal on the effects of the R18+ discussion paper; and says public view will merely &#8220;inform [the] decision&#8221; on R18+ for games. To read more click here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura Parker over at <a href="http://au.gamespot.com/?tag=header;logo" target="_blank">gamespot</a>, reports that the  Australian federal government is remaining noncommittal on the effects of the R18+ discussion paper; and says public view will merely &#8220;inform [the] decision&#8221; on R18+ for games.</p>
<p>To read more click <a href="http://au.gamespot.com/news/6248868.html?om_act=convert&amp;om_clk=picks&amp;tag=picks;title;1" target="_blank">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/no-word-from-government-on-r18-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The time to be heard is now: EB Games launches R18+ Classification Petition</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/the-time-to-be-heard-is-now-eb-games-launches-r18-classification-petition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/the-time-to-be-heard-is-now-eb-games-launches-r18-classification-petition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=1573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRISBANE, Queensland&#8211;Feb. 03, 2010—EB Games, Australia’s largest video game and entertainment software retailer, today announced that they will be responding to overwhelming customer demand by throwing their full support behind the push for an R18+ classification for computer games in Australia. From today, in all 350 EB Games stores across Australia and online at http://www.ebgames.com.au/consumers will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">BRISBANE, Queensland&#8211;Feb. 03, 2010—EB Games, Australia’s largest video game and entertainment software retailer, today announced that they will be responding to overwhelming customer demand by throwing their full support behind the push for an R18+ classification for computer games in Australia. From today, in all 350 EB Games stores across Australia and online at <a href="http://www.ebgames.com.au/" target="_blank">http://www.ebgames.com.au/</a>consumers will be able to sign a petition that will be used to lobby the Government to introduce an R18+ classification category for computer games. This petition is in response to the Government’s discussion paper and calls for submissions on the topic of: <em>Should the Australian National Classification Scheme include an R 18+ classification category for computer games?</em>When asked why EB Games has chosen to take the unprecedented step of supporting this issue with an instore and online campaign, Managing Director Steve Wilson responded,</p>
<p>“Because our customers asked us to.”</p>
<p>St<span id="more-1573"></span>eve continued, “With the release of the Government’s discussion paper, we knew as a company that we needed to act on this issue as it continues to cripple our industry and cost local jobs. We did however want to be sure that our customers were as passionate about the matter as we are.”</p>
<p>EB Games set up an online poll on <a href="http://www.ebgames.com.au/">www.ebgames.com.au</a> and simply asked “Do you support an R18+ classification for video games?”</p>
<p>In only 10 days, over 50,000 people responded to the survey with a resounding 84% (42,854) of respondents stating ‘Yes, It’s time for change!’</p>
<p>“Our customers have sent us a message loud and clear that this is an issue that needs to be addressed and we only get one shot at this. Once this Government paper is closed, it could be many years before we get another chance to voice our opinion on this issue. The time to be heard is now” Steve stated.</p>
<p>Steve continued to state “This is not a call for violent video games, but rather a call for a better classification system that brings Australia in line with the rest of the world and other Australian entertainment industries, such as films.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong>To sign the petition and have your voice heard, head into your local EB Games store or visit <a href="http://www.ebgames.com.au/">www.ebgames.com.au</a>. All petitions must be received by 14<sup>th</sup> February, 2010.</p>
<p><strong> </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>About EB Games</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>EB Games Australia head office is located in Queensland, with retail stores operating in every Australian State and Territory. EB Games Australia is part of GameStop Corp. Currently EB Games have 350 retail stores in Australia. The Company sells new and preowned video game software, hardware and accessories for video game systems from Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft. In addition, the company sells PC entertainment software, related accessories and other merchandise. General information on EB Games can be obtained at the company&#8217;s website: <a href="http://www.ebgames.com.au/">http://www.ebgames.com.au</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Source: EB Games.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Debra McGrath<br />
National Brand &amp; Marketing Manager<br />
EB Games.<br />
(07) 3860-77736</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/02/the-time-to-be-heard-is-now-eb-games-launches-r18-classification-petition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GameSpot examines the pro-R18+ groups in Australia</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2010/01/gamespot-examines-the-pro-r18-groups-in-australia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2010/01/gamespot-examines-the-pro-r18-groups-in-australia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classification/R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussion paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R18+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igea.net/?p=1568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GameSpot AU takes a look at the biggest and most active pro-R18+ groups here in Australia and how they are trying to rally the Australian population behind the cause. To read about the different groups and see how you can become involved, click here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://au.gamespot.com/" target="_blank">GameSpot AU</a> takes a look at the biggest and most active pro-R18+ groups here in Australia and how they are trying to rally the Australian population behind the cause.</p>
<p>To read about the different groups and see how you can become involved, click <a href="http://au.gamespot.com/news/6248118.html?om_act=convert&amp;om_clk=picks&amp;tag=picks;title;2" target="_blank">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2010/01/gamespot-examines-the-pro-r18-groups-in-australia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Submission 2 to Technological Protection Measures Review</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2005/11/submission-2-to-technological-protection-measures-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2005/11/submission-2-to-technological-protection-measures-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iGEA News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://igea.staging.headshift.com/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Presentation to House of Representatives Standing Committee for Legal and Constitutional Affairs Inquiry into TPM Exceptions &#8211; Submission 2]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-content/uploads/2005/11/Submission-2.pdf" target="_blank">Presentation to House of Representatives Standing Committee for Legal and Constitutional Affairs Inquiry into TPM Exceptions &#8211; Submission 2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2005/11/submission-2-to-technological-protection-measures-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Submission 1 to Technological Protection Measures Review</title>
		<link>http://www.igea.net/2005/10/submission-1-to-technological-protection-measures-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.igea.net/2005/10/submission-1-to-technological-protection-measures-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iGEA News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://igea.staging.headshift.com/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Inquiry into Technological Protection Measures (TPM) Exceptions &#8211; Submission 1]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.igea.net/wp-content/uploads/2005/10/Submission-1.pdf" target="_blank">Submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Inquiry into Technological Protection Measures (TPM) Exceptions &#8211; Submission 1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.igea.net/2005/10/submission-1-to-technological-protection-measures-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

